|
Tim Bale and Aleks
Szczerbiak, "Why Is There No Christian Democracy in Poland -
And Why Should We Care?" Party Politics, 14 (July,
2008), 479-500.
First paragraph:
In the field of party politics, there is an implicit
expectation that the party systems of Central and Eastern
Europe (CEE) will, over time, come to resemble those of the
Western half of the continent. True, there is evidence to
suggest that the differences between 'old' and 'new' Europe
are as significant as the similarities, and may prove very
persistent. But, superficially at least, there appears to be
some support for such an expectation. After all, most CEE
countries have parties that can be plausibly placed on the
familiar dimensions (left-right, authoritarian-liberal,
etc.) and many of them, rather conveniently, get together
with their Western counterparts in European party
federations or at least party groups within the European
Parliament (EP). One of the obvious differences between the
party systems of CEE and their Western counterparts, for
example, is that there are no cases in the former of a
Christian Democratic party that could claim anything like
the success enjoyed by such parties in the latter in
countries like Belgium, Germany, The Netherlands and, before
its implosion in the early 1990s, Italy.
- Figures and
Tables:
- None.
First paragraph of
conclusion:
No self-declared Christian Democratic party has been
successful in post-1989 Poland. None of the currently
'successful' Polish right-wing or centre-right parties has
self-consciously sought to profile itself as Christian
Democratic, nor do any of them fit the ideal type of an
archetypal Christian Democratic party that we set out in our
five-point model. A close examination of the period after
the fall of the communist regime found that only the first
of seven factors identified as crucial to the success of a
Christian Democratic party - a substantial, practising Roman
Catholic population - appeared to have been present
unambiguously during the emergence of democratic, multiparty
politics. A second factor - fear of a takeover by a militant
secularist, anti-clerical, egalitarian and potentially
totalitarian left - also existed, but only in attenuated
form. None of the other five factors identified were present
in Poland, or only in a very limited or qualified form. That
this was the case, however, was very much a matter of agency
and contingency as well as structure.
|