|
Ingrid van Biezen and Petr
Kopecky, "The State and the Parties: Public Funding, Public
Regulation and Rent-Seeking in Contemporary Democracies,"
Party Politics, 13 (March 2007), 235-254.
First paragraph:
LaPalombara and Weiner observe in the opening sentence of
their seminal volume that '[t]he political party is
a creature of modern and modernizing political systems'. In
such systems, 'the political party in one form or another is
omnipresent' (LaPalombara and Weiner, 1966: 3). The
political party, they argue, is 'a symbol of political
modernity'; parties emerge 'whenever the activities of a
political system reach a certain degree of complexity' (pp.
3, 4). They thus echo Schattschneider's oft-quoted assertion
(1942: 1) which emphasizes the centrality of political
parties for contemporary systems of representative
democracy.
Figures and Tables:
Table 1. Relationship between parties and the state
Figure 1. Corruption of political parties
First Paragraph of Conclusion:
Political parties and the state live together in close
symbiosis in contemporary democracies. We have analyzed the
party-state relationship along three different dimensions.
First, the widespread availability of public subsidies to
political parties demonstrates that, despite their recent
introduction, state subventions have rapidly become a
ubiquitous phenomenon in contemporary democracies. Second,
whereas the state in liberal democracies traditionally
stayed away from intervening in the internal affairs of
parties, the regulation of party activity and behavior
through public law and the constitution is much more common
today, indicating that parties are more extensively managed
by the state than they were in the past. Longitudinal and
cross-national data on these dimensions are not available,
at least not on the global scale we have dealt with here.
However, these findings support existing research, which has
drawn attention to the increasingly close linkage between
parties and the state, and suggest a near-universal trend in
the process of party transformation, by which parties in
contemporary democracies have become best understood as part
of the state rather than the representative agents of civil
society. Finally, our analysis shows a pervasiveness of
practices of party rent-seeking, which suggests that parties
are to a considerable degree in control of the state and
state resources. The combined result of these phenomena is
that the 'reach' of the party system, as Daalder(1966) once
put, increasingly permeates the institutions of the
state.
|