|
Justin Fisher, David Denver
and Gordon Hands, "Party Membership and Campaign Activity in
Britain: The Impact of Electoral Performance," Party
Politics, 12 (July, 2006), 505-519.
First Paragraph:
A substantial body of literature has demonstrated that
effective constituency election campaigns can have
significant electoral payoffs for political parties (Denver
and Hands, 1997, 1998; Denver et al., 2002; Pattie et al.,
1995; Whiteley and Seyd, 1994, 2003). In part, this has been
due to greater involvement by the parties' central
headquarters in planning and managing constituency campaigns
(Fisher et al., 2006), but it remains clear, nonetheless,
that parties need active members on the ground and good
local organization if they are to mount effective campaigns
at the constituency level. But what determines levels of
local membership and activity? A number of recent studies
have suggested that these may be significantly affected by
previous electoral success or failure in the constituency
concerned. gislative' maneuvers, the 'legislators' engage in
their own form of hyperbole, threats and verbal flexing.
Indeed, Hulk Hogan would be proud.
Figures and Tables:
Table 1. Mean number of party members per constituency,
1992-2001
Table 2. Mean percent of electorate covered by active
campaign organization, 1992-2001
Table 3. Correlations between size of membership and extent
of local activity, 1992-2001
Table 4. Correlations between party membership, campaign
activity and the socio-economic characteristics of
constituencies, 2001
Table 5. Partial correlations: membership and activity
levels in 2001 and percentage majority in 1997 (controlling
for membership and activity in 1997
Table 6. The impact of 1997 election outcomes on party
membership and activity 200
Table 7. The impact of 1997 marginality and electoral
outcomes on party membership and campaign activity 200
Table 8. Short-term and long-term electoral impacts on
membership and campaign activity 2001
Last Paragraph:
What we have shown here is that any such spiral can be
broken by a single election in which there is a sharp
reversal of previous results. The performance of parties in
constituencies during the years of Conservative dominance
between 1979 and 1992 appears to have had no impact on their
membership and activity in 2001. In contrast, the
constituency outcomes of the 1997 election generally had
clear and significant short-term effects. If Whiteley and
Seyd are correct, then the 1997 election may have started a
new spiral. We may expect the changes to constituency status
consequent upon the 1997 election to have a long-term impact
on the health and activity of local parties - at least until
another election sees a sharp reversal of the parties'
fortunes.
|