|
Karina Pedersen and Jo
Saglie, "New Technology in Ageing Parties: Internet Use in
Danish and Norwegian Parties," Party Politics, 11
(May, 2005), 359-377.
First Paragraph:
While 'cyber-optimists' describe the democratic potential of
the Internet and underline how we can gain access to more
information and new channels of communication,
'cyber-pessimists' highlight the potential threats to
democracy; new technology will strengthen the power of
existing elites, and those who lack access to the Internet
will be excluded. The potential consequences of the Internet
are frequently the subject of discussion, but much research
on democracy and the Internet lacks data on whether and how
citizens actually use these new possibilities.
Figures and Tables:
Table 1. Members' and congress delegates' visits to party
websites (Denmark and Norway), by holding party office,
2000/01 (%)
Table 2. Members' participation in party facilitated
electronic debates (Denmark), by holding party office,
2000/01 (%)
Table 3. Members' and congress delegates' reception of email
from the central party office (Denmark and Norway), by
holding party office, 2000/01 (%)
Table 4. Members' and congress delegates' use of email to
keep contact with fellow members (Norway), by holding party
office, 2000/01 (%)
Two paragraphs from the last section:
Our interviews with party organizers, as well as the
Norwegian congress delegate survey, show that the new ICTs
have become fully integrated parts of party work among the
top- and middle-level elites. Administrative processes are
simplified, and communication between central office,
parliament and party branches has become easier. This
administrative rationalization should not be underestimated;
effective communication is necessary to maintain party
organizations as a link between citizens and the political
elite.
The party member surveys tell a different story. About a
third of members visited the party website, but most of them
less frequently than once a month. Email reception and
participation in electronic debates were even more limited
and therefore not substantial characteristics of
Scandinavian party membership. This may make a difference to
the character of party membership, as some members that did
not engage in traditional party activities were attracted by
these new activities, but the impact was limited during the
early 2000s.
|