|
Taylor Dark III, "The Rise of a Global Party? American
Party Organizations Abroad," Party Politics, 9 (March
2003), 241-255.
First Paragraph:
One of the oldest and most resilient ways of conceptualizing
political party activity has been to divide it into three
components: the party in the electorate, the party in
government and the party as an organization. The last of
these components was, of course, defined in reference to the
leaders and activists who worked through the party apparatus
to gain members, financial contributions and votes on behalf
of party nominees. Naturally enough, this activity was
assumed to take place entirely within the territorial
boundaries of the country where the party contested
elections -- American party organizations mobilized within
the USA, British parties within Britain, and so on. The
claim of this article is that this assumption is now
outdated, and that in the current age of globalization
American party organizations have taken the first steps to
become 'global' organizations themselves. While the extent
of this development should not be exaggerated, it is of
sufficient importance to merit the attention of scholars of
American and party politics. The point was underscored in
dramatic fashion during the 2000 presidential election, when
votes from American citizens overseas became a crucial
factor in the final determination of who won the electoral
votes of Florida, and thus the presidency itself (Barstow
and Van Natta, 2001). As that episode revealed, the
assumption that American electoral politics can be
understood simply by examining domestic party activity is no
longer tenable.
Figures and Tables:
Table 1: Private US citizens residing abroad (estimated):
top 15 countries by American population, July 1999
Table 2: Breakdown of Demcrats Abroad membership March
2000
Table 3: Survey of attendees at the Democrats Abroad Global
Convention Paris, France 1 April 2000 (total responses:
76)
Last Paragraph:
Lastly, we must return to a question posed at the beginning
of this article: does this phenomenon constitute a
qualitative leap in the nature of American party
organization, one that breaks or alters the links between
territoriality and citizenship? The answer has to be an
ambiguous one. On the one hand, we clearly see the
intensification of cross-border political activity (part of
the very definition of globalization), the emergence of new
issues for partisan competition (overseas taxation, voting
rights, citizenship transmission, etc.), and the creation of
new possibilities for split loyalties (voting in one country
while living in another). The most interesting revelation is
that a US citizen living abroad, perhaps for many decades,
and perhaps while even holding citizenship in another
country, can serve on the highest decision-making body of
the Democratic Party. While considerable controversy has
been attached to the idea that Mexican-Americans with dual
citizenship are residing in the USA while voting in Mexican
elections and even serving in Mexican offices, few have
noticed that some American citizens who have lived abroad
--including in Mexico -- are doing much the same thing.
Nevertheless, such developments do not constitute the
definitive creation of a 'global party' -- rather, they
imply the globalization of what are still mostly traditional
American party activities. A truly global party, of course,
would require a global state with which to interact; for the
moment, we have only national political parties with global
arms dedicated to accomplishing strictly delimited tasks.
Where these organizational forms may eventually lead remains
as interesting and as unknown as the future of globalization
itself.
|