Ami Pedahzur and Avraham Brichta, "The Institutionalization of Extreme Right-Wing Charismatic Parties: A Paradox?" Party Politics, January 2002, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 31-49.

First Paragraph:
On the morning of 4 October 1999, almost every citizen in the Western world was exposed to the smiling face of Austrian far-right leader Jörg Haider filling the front pages of the daily newspapers. Haider had very good reason to smile. His party had won 26.9 percent of the total vote and thus became the second largest party in the Austrian parliament. This was the greatest success experienced by an extreme right-wing party in Europe for the past fifty years. Four months later the smiling face of Haider reappeared, this time after becoming king-maker in the newly established coalition government in Austria.

Figures and Tables:
Table 1. Phases of development of charismatic parties*
Figure 1. The FN at the legislative Polls*
Figure 2. The FPÖ at the legislative polls

Last Paragraph:
However, as mentioned by Panebianco, the fact that a party is highly institutionalized is no guarantee that de institutionalization . . . will not take place when its environment undergoes radical changes (1988: 623). Our definition of institutionalization is rather different from Panebiancos. Yet, we tend to agree that even after completing the institutionalization process and reaching stabilization, hard charismatic parties are still vulnerable, like other parties, to external and internal influences. If they are unsuccessful in realizing the routinization of charisma, these parties are even more likely to be susceptible when the charismatic leader leaves the scene.