|
Gideon Rahat and Reuven Y. Hazan, "Candidate Selection
Methods: An Analytical Framework," Party Politics, 7
(May 2001), 297-322.
First Paragraph:
Developing tools for the study of candidate selection
methods is important in two respects. First, when we study
party politics, appropriate tools enable us to draw a map of
a major element in the party's internal power structure.
Second, if we claim that the behavior of parties is affected
by the nature of the electoral system, then the behavior of
individual politicians must be affected by the nature of the
selection method. This means that without analytical tools
such as those supplied by electoral systems researchers (for
example, Rae, 1967; Taagepera and Shugart, 1989), we lack an
important factor for analyzing party politics. In light of
the personification of politics and changes in party
organization that lead to increased autonomy for the
individual politicians at the top (Katz and Mair, 1995;
Katz, in this issue), this gap needs to be filled through
further research.
Figures and
Tables:
Figure 1: Candidacy p. 301
Figure 2: Party Selectorates p. 301
Figure 3: Candidacy and party selectorates in candidate
selection p. 304
Figure 4: Centralization and decentralization of candidate
selection p. 305
Figure 5: Candidate nomination and party representational
control p. 307
Table 1: Appointment systems and voting systems p. 308
Figure 6: Candidate selectorates and party cohesion p.
314
Last Paragraph:
Does the Israeli case show that the future of candidate
selection methods lies in its past? Not necessarily, but it
does show that there is a way out of the predicament of
democratization - if the candidate selection method is not a
legal requirement, but rather a partisan decision. Moreover,
Israel is not a 'prototypical' case study. The Australian
Labour and Liberal parties began shifting away from party
primaries as early as the 1950s; from the 1970s onward,
several Belgian parties phased out or abolished use of
membership balloting as part of the candidate selection
process; in the 1980s and 1990s, most Dutch parties (except
D'66) eliminated the option of balloting local party
members; and the Austrian OVP and SPO ceased to use party
primaries as a candidate selection method in the two most
recent elections, after changing their statutes to recognize
this method and implementing it in the 1994 elections. In
sum, the parties' ability to 'undemocratize' their candidate
selection methods and reassert both party discipline and
cohesion could be the harbinger of a reversal in the overall
demise of parties.
|